There are many tricks and tools available to enhance the quality of our images, about as many as there are genres in photography. In fact, I would love to learn which current software reduces noise the best myself. I’m just a regular landscape photographer who happens to shoot Nikon. Methodįull disclosure: I’m not affiliated with any brand or software developer. Nikon Z fc, Nikkor Z 16-50mm, Nikkor Z 40mm f/2, Nikkor Z 28mm f/2.8 (SE), Nikkor Z DX 18-140mm, Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2, Voigtlander 23mm f/1.“Expanse of the Night.” Shot with a Nikon D750 with a Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Nikon AE (Rokinon, Bower, Walimex: they’re all the same, just rebranded). DXO could come up with something else for non raw images but it wouldn't be the same quality. This technology was not designed for nor would work with non raw images. The extraordinary results of DeepPRIME are only possible with raw files for which it is optimized and extremely processor intense. DXO PhotoLab is a raw processor/convertor. I rarely process non-raw images but when I do I use Topaz which is the only reason I purchased the license. That is why I also own a license for Topaz Denoise AI 3. Picture North Carolina wrote in post #19266550Īgree except for your last statement. Any image editing product that does not recognize this and offer options to address this is a poorly-designed product. The fact that DXO does not and ON1's NoNoise presently does not means that even tho the products might product better results on RAW images, the products are useless to some users. A good, well-rounded denoising product will work well in all circumstances, not just one. When post-processing, many thing users may and can do introduce noise. However, the DXO product and the present ON1 product both not working at all or not working well on non-RAW images is a major shortfall. In many other reviews the DXO product wins. Nikon Z fc, Nikkor Z 16-50mm, Nikkor Z 40mm f/2, Nikkor Z 28mm f/2.8 (SE), Nikkor Z DX 18-140mm, Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2, Voigtlander 23mm f/1.2, DXO PhotoLab 5 Elite, DXO FilmPack 6 Elite, DXO ViewPoint 3Īgree. Those points aside, for most people and for most images, any of the 3 current technologies will give generally satisfying results. One of the advantages of using the products from ON1 and Topaz is that they will both work on non-raw images while DXO's DeepPRIME works on raw images only. However, in my experience, neither ON1 NoNoise or Topaz Denoise AI comes close to matching the results with raw files from DXO's DeepPRIME noise reduction which is available in DXO's PhotoLab 4 as well as their PureRAW standalone app. One must be careful not to over apply the settings with ON1 No Noise which can cause too much smoothing. While the ON1 product has a few bugs and the results with non raw images is still essentially in beta according to ON1, I found the results with NoNoise to be noticeably better and more pleasing after comparing dozens of images processed in both Topaz Denoise AI 3 and ON1 NoNoise. I have a license for Topaz Denoise AI and spent a few hours comparing it to the trial of ON1 NoNoise. ON1 NoNoise AI Versus Topaz DeNoise AI: Noise Reduction Throwdown Picture North Carolina wrote in post #19262849Īfter ON1 makes some processing and annoying interface changes, it may be the tool of choice.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |